Samsung 860 EVO Specs
Type element: 2.five-inch
Interface: SATA: 6 Gbps
NAND: Samsung 3D V-NAND 3bit MLC
Capacities: 4TB, 2TB, 1TB, 500GB, 250GB
Cache: 4GB LPDDR4 (4TB)
2GB LPDDR4 (2TB)
1GB LPDDR4 (1TB)
512MB LPDDR4 (250/500GB)
Controller: Samsung MJX Controller
Efficiency
Seq.Study/Generate Pace: Around 550/520MB/s
Ran.Go through/Create Velocity (QD32): Max. 98K IOPS / 90K IOPS
System Sleep: two.6 mW for 1TB (Nearly 8mW for 4TB)
Administration SW: Magician Software for SSD administration
TBW (Endurance): 4TB: 2,four hundred TBW
2TB: 1,200 TBW
1TB: 600 TBW
500GB: three hundred TBW
250GB: 150 TBW
Guarantee: 5 years or as many as 2,four hundred TBW
Design and style and Build
The brand new 860 EVO line is identical to past EVO lines, that may be, a black situation and a lightweight gray sq. displayed on The underside middle beneath the Samsung logo. A sticker is placed on the again from the push, which indicates data you may want including model range, serial number, and capability.
Samsung 860 EVO Specifications
When opening up the travel, you will see the new Samsung’s new MJX controller, NAND pack, and DRAM over the compact PCB.
Flipping the PCB around displays the opposite NAND pack.
Overall performance
Testbed
The examination System leveraged in these checks is actually a Dell PowerEdge R740xd server. We measure general performance through a Dell H730P RAID card inside this server, Though we established the cardboard in HBA manner only to disable the affect of RAID card cache. The methodology applied better reflects finish-user workflow Together with the regularity, scalability and suppleness tests within just virtualized server offers. A sizable target is put on drive latency across the complete load array of the generate, not only on the smallest QD1 (Queue-Depth 1) ranges. We do this simply because many of the typical customer benchmarks don’t adequately seize close-person workload profiles.
SQL Server Effectiveness
We use a light-weight virtualized SQL Server instance to appropriately represent what an software developer would use on an area workstation. The take a look at is comparable to what we run on storage arrays and organization drives, just scaled back again for being a much better approximation for behaviors employed by the top consumer. The workload employs the current draft of your Transaction Processing Effectiveness Council’s Benchmark C (TPC-C), a web based transaction processing benchmark that simulates the routines found in elaborate application environments.
The lightweight SQL Server VM is configured with 3 vDisks: 100GB volume for boot, a 350GB quantity for your databases and log information, and a 150GB quantity used for the databases backup we Recuperate after Just about every run. From the method useful resource viewpoint, we configure Each individual VM with 16 vCPUs, 32GB of DRAM and leverage the LSI Logic SAS SCSI controller. This test works by using SQL Server 2014 operating on Home windows Server 2012 R2 visitor VMs, and is also pressured by Dell’s Benchmark Factory for Databases.
SQL Server Tests Configuration (per VM)
Windows Server 2012 R2
Storage Footprint: 600GB allotted, 500GB utilized
SQL Server 2014
Databases Size: 1,five hundred scale
Virtual Consumer Load: fifteen,000
RAM Buffer: 24GB
Check Size: three hours
2.five hours preconditioning
half an hour sample interval
When thinking about SQL Server Output, the 1TB Samsung 860 EVO generate recorded 3,147 TPS, which was just powering the 850 Professional 1TB.